Runceanu Sabin studies Moldova, Philosophical Counseling, and Migration History. IOAN DAMASCHIN more. by Mircea Ramurean Ioan – Istoria bisericeasca universalamore. by Mircea Dogmatica Sf. silvestru de Canev vol 5more. by Mircea. 1 SF. IOAN GURĂ DE AUR, Scrieri – partea întâi. Omilii la Facere (I), in vol. 2 SF. IOAN DAMASCHIN, Dogmatica, translated by Pr. Dumitru Fecioru, Editura.

Author: Maukree Mijora
Country: Vietnam
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Business
Published (Last): 4 November 2017
Pages: 170
PDF File Size: 5.22 Mb
ePub File Size: 5.16 Mb
ISBN: 818-1-52216-946-8
Downloads: 81408
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Yozshuzil

This composition from two natures does not turn the one man into two, but as I have said there is one man by the composition of body and soul. As I have said, if we understand ipan manner of the incarnation we shall see that two natures come together dogmahica one another, without confusion or change, in an indivisible union.

The Robber Council approved of Eutyches and proclaimed one nature after union, which is heretical.

Uso de cookies

Nestorianism is defined by other positions: John the Damascene ascribes these terms to their Christologyhe is acting as Prof. Damaschln vom ramne aceiasi, indiferent de ce argumente se vor aduce. If you read in greek or in roumanian you can understand that the copts are heretics to Sever of Antioch: I talked with Fr.

One cannot argue otherwise. These are not pastoral terms which supposedly could be used in a way that is dogmatically impresise.


He and his followers also have other heretical teachings, see my previous post. It is a very twisted and dishonest logic. The interpretation of Sever is monophisitism miaphisitism! So you logic completely falls on its head. It is less important how the Council got to its final formula, the discussions, controversies etc.

Once again those who twist the truth are unaware that in fact there is but one incarnate nature of the Word.

Samuel, Severus follows the doctrine of partial essences by which persons are partial essences, and which is also followed by Arius — thus, in his acceptance as described by St. Cred ca aveti mari probleme in a intelege ca. Many Chalcedonians find it convenient for them to completely ignore this important part of the minutes of Chalcedon at the first session: The Orthodox faith is not a bet.


Daca celalalt are argumente solide, daca, printr-o intamplare, are dreptate, sunt dispus sa devin adeptul credintei lui? Clearly the use of the analogy contradicts your interpretation.

Athanasios decries how two damaschih were split. He has an egotistical phromena, like Pope Shenouda before him. Athanasios and he said he did not ask to rejoin the Coptic Church. But as the relevant theological points have been made, we should stop before sliding into irrelevant talk.

To say that he is incarnate is sufficient for a perfectly clear indication of the fact that he became man. Such is the case with a human being who comprises soul and body. The Sever misunderstand the Sf Kiril, and the formula of St Kiril is not represent the formula of the orthodoxia. They saw Him thirsty, as Man, and dogmatjca saw Him giving drink, as God. It is our contention that if we carefully examine the manner of the economy in the flesh and attentively investigate the mystery, we shall see that the Word of God the Father was made man and made flesh but did not fashion ion sacred body from his damwschin divine nature, but rather took it from the virgin.

Anatolius statement was arbitrary ,as is attested to the minutes of the Synod and by the way in which these minutes were understood by subsequent fathers. May God forgive you for bearing false witness against our fathers.

Runceanu Sabin –

Prin urmare, pentru acest motiv, se zice o singura fire a oamenilor, pentru ca orice om este compus din suflet si corp. Sabatul face parte in legea morala, este chiar in inima ei, ca sa spun asa.


To which I will personally add, it was Roman Papal malice that Dioscorus was deposed. Athanasios was excommunicated because he defended the Coptic human rights and he wanted the Copts to come back to the 4th Ecumenical Synod of Calcedon, that meant the return to the One, Holy, Catholic and Apostolic Church, which is the Greek Orthodox Church.

Insa si ridicarea anatemei contra miafizitilor de catre ortodocsi este invalida.

Thuswhen St. Pr Matei a explicat deja de ce formularea Sf. Subsequentlywe presented the following reasons why this theory is not consumed with the patristic and synodal tradition:.

Venirea lui Hristos pe pamant a fost, printre altele,si pentru a ne fi un exemplu de urmat. Truly indeed, Christ speaks wisdom in his condemnation against hypocrites: The Coptic Orthodox Church confesses thus in her liturgy, a text added in the 11th century: Vezi, legea ceremoniala s-a inplinit in Hristos rastignit.

John Karmiris and Father John Romanidis regarding the orthodoxy of the Anti-Chalcedonians were a result of an early enthusiasm which soon thereafter gave way to positions of serious questions and much deliberation. And I can say with confidence there is nothing heretical in Severus of Antioch.

Divine and Human-that preached the IV Ecumenical Concile of Calcedon, that anatematized the Sever and his teaching of one nature-divine-human. He witnessed the good the confession before Pontius Pilate, suffered, died, and was buried, and on the 3rd day rose from the dead, ascended to the heavens, and is sitting at Your right hand, oh Father.

Let us not start bringing sentimentalist rhetorics, instead of arguments.